Back
Hexagonifera

From Williams et al., 2017:

[Hexagonifera, Cookson and Eisenack, 1961a, p. 73-74; Emendations: Cookson and Eisenack, 1962b, p. 496; Stover and Evitt, 1978, p. 107–108.

Type species: Hexagonifera glabra, Cookson and Eisenack, 1961a (pl.12, fig.11)]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Original description: [Cookson and Eisenack, 1961]:

Description:
Shell oval, wall of variable thickness, smooth or ornamented. Pylomle formed by the removal of a 6-sided lid at one pole.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emended description:


Cookson and Eisenack, 1962:

Description:
Shell oval, either without or partially or completely enclosed in a thin, transparent, detachable membrane; wall of variable thickness, smooth or variously sculptured. Pylome formed by the removal of a six-sided portion of the shell at one end.

-------------------------------------
Stover and Evitt, 1978:

Synopsis:
Cysts proximate, subspherical to lenticular, without horns; autophragm smooth or ornamented with features of low relief; paratabulation indicated generally by archeopyle only, other indications faint or lacking; archeopyle intercalary, Type l; archeopyle index >0.5.

Description:
Shape: Subspherical to lenticular.
Wall relationships: Autophragm only.
Wall features: No parasutural features. Autophragm smooth or ornamented with features of low relief.
Paratabulation: Indicated generally by archeopyle only; other indications indistinct or absent.
Archeopyle: Intercalary, Type I (2a only); archeopyle index >0.5.
Paracingulum: Not indicated, or indicated by faint transverse markings.
Parasulcus: Not indicated.
Size: Intermediate.

Affinites:
Hexagonifera differs from Pyxidiella in being subspherical to lenticular rather than elongate ellipsoidal. Retention of both genera based essentially on a difference in shape hardly seems justified.
Feedback/Report bug